-
Jeffrey Joe Hinton replied to the topic "Vendor Section?" – 6 years, 10 months ago
Not to squash a great idea but if yu’d play with the website just a little, you see that under weblinks we do have a list of vendors that have been in our corner from the start. At least most… Read more»
-
Bruce R. Schaefer replied to the topic "Vendor Section?" – 6 years, 10 months ago
Holy Boosters, Batman! This really IS a good idea. Warren?
-
Art Hoag replied to the topic "Vendor Section?" – 6 years, 10 months ago
Great idea Ken!Art
-
Bruce R. Schaefer replied to the topic "Shuttle approach possibly visible to Coloradoans?" – 6 years, 10 months ago
The ISS was magnitude -2.1 and and the shuttle was about a 0.0 or so. Definitely worth getting up for….
Wow, that’s bright! Could you see them waving atcha?
-
Brad Morse replied to the topic "Shuttle approach possibly visible to Coloradoans?" – 6 years, 10 months ago
But wait a minute, John, this is manned space travel… hee, hee… :)I treated it like a daytime Iridium flare 🙂 BTW, I saw the ISS and the shuttle go over yesterday at 5:30AM (ish). The ISS was magnitude -2.1… Read more»
-
Bruce R. Schaefer replied to the topic "Shuttle approach possibly visible to Coloradoans?" – 6 years, 10 months ago
When living in So. Cal., I remember the double BAM-BAM as it would fly over occasionally to land at Edwards. Even though it was in earthquake country, kinda reassuring to know it got down okay. 8) But wait a minute,… Read more»
-
Art Hoag replied to the topic "Shuttle approach possibly visible to Coloradoans?" – 6 years, 10 months ago
Way jealous right now John! You have no idea, I was so bummed when I saw it was heading for you and not me, no hard feelings though :DI remember just a month or two ago, watching the shuttle and… Read more»
-
Brad Morse replied to the topic "Shuttle approach possibly visible to Coloradoans?" – 6 years, 10 months ago
Saw it! cool…. I was a lot further north than what I would have liked to have been, but my wife and I were able to observe the shuttle…
-
Bruce R. Schaefer replied to the topic "Comet Holmes" – 6 years, 10 months ago
Been watching it for a few days or so. VERY cool! What’s really neat is that it went from a magnitude 17 to 2 1/2 in just a couple of hours.
-
MikeS replied to the topic "increase ejection charge delay?" – 6 years, 10 months ago
I have had good luck with this web site.http://webalt.markworld.com/webalt.htmlIt has been right on with the delay. I fill outeverything except I leave the delay length andchute size blank. I look at the time to max alt.or turn over.I have not… Read more»
-
Bruce R. Schaefer replied to the topic "increase ejection charge delay?" – 6 years, 10 months ago
bruce, your charts sound awesome … where do i get a copy?!I got them online a while ago at//www.rocstock.org/wizards/rms-delays_2938.pdfThis link gives you the warnings//rocstock.org/wizards/caveats.htmlFor some reason, I can’t access their 54mm version of rms delays.Here is another one, though not… Read more»
-
Greg Rapp replied to the topic "increase ejection charge delay?" – 6 years, 10 months ago
thanks for all the info guys! if there is one thing i can count on ncr for, it’s broad and deep knowledge of all things rockets, and a willingness to share that knowledge freely!tim you are correct, based on my… Read more»
-
Tim Thomas replied to the topic "increase ejection charge delay?" – 6 years, 10 months ago
8) I too have a Phobos, and I fly it mostly on H motors. I use 10 to 11 seconds for the H. It is almost always dead on. I have flown it on I205’s and use the whole 15… Read more»
-
Conway Stevens replied to the topic "increase ejection charge delay?" – 6 years, 10 months ago
They do vary in length of time as a S,M,L as per the reload. Not all M are the same if I remember correctly. or at one time it was that way.. May be just me showing some age..lol.. They… Read more»
-
Bruce R. Schaefer replied to the topic "increase ejection charge delay?" – 6 years, 10 months ago
This is from the AT ’05 catalog:Short=Approx. 6 sec.;Medium=Approx. 10 sec.;Long=Approx. 14 sec.;X-Long=Approx. 18 sec.Whats RDK-13+? FYI, the flight was ~10 sec. to ejection. Does that sound right for the M?So, yes, 10 sec is dead on M. And, probably… Read more»
-
Conway Stevens replied to the topic "increase ejection charge delay?" – 6 years, 10 months ago
S=shortM=mediumL=long
-
Greg Rapp replied to the topic "increase ejection charge delay?" – 6 years, 10 months ago
Thanks, Bruce, so I can assume that the L delay is longer than the M? Smehow I would think the opposite! Whats RDK-13+? FYI, the flight was ~10 sec. to ejection. Does that sound right for the M?
-
Bruce R. Schaefer replied to the topic "increase ejection charge delay?" – 6 years, 10 months ago
So, the question is, with an aerotech motor, how does one increase the ejection charge delay?You get the L delay, from Tim Thomas. Every sim I’ve ever done with the I357 puts the delay way longer than the M. Technically,… Read more»
-
Adrian replied to the topic "F record attempt: 8400 feet" – 6 years, 10 months ago
With regards to the strange pressure effects on boost, where was/were your vent(s)? That could have a huge effect on the pressure readings…The vents were just ahead of the front edge of the motor, which put them just behind the… Read more»
-
Chris LaPanse replied to the topic "F record attempt: 8400 feet" – 6 years, 10 months ago
With regards to the strange pressure effects on boost, where was/were your vent(s)? That could have a huge effect on the pressure readings…
- Load More
