-
edward replied to the topic "Loki Coming to Colorado." – 6 years, 10 months ago
For those motors I think you’d have to turn to the dark side :)Edward
-
Adrian replied to the topic "Loki Coming to Colorado." – 6 years, 10 months ago
I’d love to find long-burning, full-impulse, G, H, and I motors. I didn’t see anything like that on Loki’s website, though.
-
Art Hoag replied to the topic "Loki Coming to Colorado." – 6 years, 10 months ago
I personally think that Loki makes a great product and as stated earlier; if there was local support, then I think many people including myself would take it and run (not literally, but you know what I mean)! The key… Read more»
-
edward replied to the topic "Loki Coming to Colorado." – 6 years, 10 months ago
Loki motors seem to be very nice – I’ve seen a flew fly and have been very impressed 🙂 I like how the 54mm’s have the machined in thrust ring – nice touch.Edward
-
Conway Stevens replied to the topic "Loki Coming to Colorado." – 6 years, 10 months ago
Well it will give one more to the variety of available motors to fly. What other products would people be interested in? they do motors all the way to 98mm and even have a lot more to offer for the… Read more»
-
Chris LaPanse replied to the topic "Loki Coming to Colorado." – 6 years, 10 months ago
I have the Loki 38 set, and I love it. Honestly, they are some of the most impressive motors for their size I have ever seen. I won’t stop flying Aerotech, but they are certainly a wonderful addition (and the… Read more»
-
Warren B. Musselman replied to the topic "Loki Coming to Colorado." – 6 years, 10 months ago
I have a Loki 54mm case (can’t remember the size offhand, but it holds the K350) and have burned one load in it. Expect I’ll be burning a few more as I like the moonburners.Warren
-
Conway Stevens replied to the topic "Loki Coming to Colorado." – 6 years, 10 months ago
Actually Loki has agreed with a new local vendor as to become their motor line and will very soon in the very near future be servicing Colorado with Loki motors. So the support will be VERY high. Thats what… Read more»
-
Ed Dawson replied to the topic "Loki Coming to Colorado." – 6 years, 10 months ago
Conway,I’m very interested in their moon burners.I know a couple of people have talked about carrying the line, and I’m all for that. Personally, I’m waiting to see if there will be real support locally before I belly up for… Read more»
-
Tim Thomas replied to the topic "Looking for ride to Labor Day launch From Boulder" – 6 years, 10 months ago
8) Welcome Steve!!! Well, I don’t know where you launch in Calie, But come on up the the best launch site in the US of A. The Pawnee is some kind of cool. Stop by and say hello, maybe I… Read more»
-
Chris LaPanse replied to the topic "Looking for ride to Labor Day launch From Boulder" – 6 years, 10 months ago
The club launch this saturday?I’m a freshman Aerospace engineer, and I’m headed up with my dad this saturday just for the day. I’m in Brackett hall – if you want a ride, we could probably take you up. It’d certainly… Read more»
-
Tim Thomas replied to the topic "AeroTech I600R Vs. Cesaroni I540W" – 6 years, 10 months ago
8) You are correct Chris. All 75mm and 98mm Pro motors are cross compatable. 8)
-
Brad Morse replied to the topic "AeroTech I600R Vs. Cesaroni I540W" – 6 years, 10 months ago
Really?I know that they are much harder to build than say the pro38 is when used with AT hardware, but the ones I’ve seen (admittedly a sample size of 2) were still just as easy to clean, leaving almost no… Read more»
-
Chris LaPanse replied to the topic "AeroTech I600R Vs. Cesaroni I540W" – 6 years, 10 months ago
Really?I know that they are much harder to build than say the pro38 is when used with AT hardware, but the ones I’ve seen (admittedly a sample size of 2) were still just as easy to clean, leaving almost no… Read more»
-
Conway Stevens replied to the topic "AeroTech I600R Vs. Cesaroni I540W" – 6 years, 10 months ago
Though the cleaning after a CTI load wouldn’t exactly be a challenging task.Actually when using it in an AT hardware set, its just like building an AT motor. Nothing like the pro38 easy to clean.. Im just thinking of time… Read more»
-
Chris LaPanse replied to the topic "AeroTech I600R Vs. Cesaroni I540W" – 6 years, 10 months ago
Though the cleaning after a CTI load wouldn’t exactly be a challenging task.
-
Conway Stevens replied to the topic "AeroTech I600R Vs. Cesaroni I540W" – 6 years, 10 months ago
I think it is a big L motor. That would be cool, fly a full L for the L2 class flight and then reload the same casing for the L3 class flight!ArtMight be better to have another case with the… Read more»
-
Conway Stevens replied to the topic "AeroTech I600R Vs. Cesaroni I540W" – 6 years, 10 months ago
AFAIK, all Pro75’s fit in the equivalent AT hardware, and that might be true about Pro98 as well (not quite as sure there). So, buy AT hardware for 75mm, and then you can fly both Pro75 and AT loads in… Read more»
-
Chris LaPanse replied to the topic "AeroTech I600R Vs. Cesaroni I540W" – 6 years, 10 months ago
That’s the L1115 IIRC. The M is the M1400, which fits in the AT 6400 case.
-
Art Hoag replied to the topic "AeroTech I600R Vs. Cesaroni I540W" – 6 years, 10 months ago
I think it is a big L motor. That would be cool, fly a full L for the L2 class flight and then reload the same casing for the L3 class flight!Art
- Load More
