Forum Replies Created
RE: Need Machining (lathe) Help I emailed Tom Rouse to see if I can get some flush aft closures in 38mm. They would be not only good as a sustainer coupler, but should help with base drag in altitude shots. With a flush aft closur... |
In forum Construction Help |
17 years ago |
RE: Fin area Take a look at Freeze Frame. It had a 10 pound camera 3 inches lateral distance off of the centerline and it was stable. Another example is cluster where one motor doesn't light. The may have curve... |
In forum Archives 2006-2010 |
17 years ago |
RE: Fin area Yes, you can really notice the mass offset in the Ellis G37 motors when you roll them, since they have an offset core. |
In forum Archives 2006-2010 |
17 years ago |
RE: Fin area Thanks Doug. The rocket im building now it stable in Rocksim. Yet my SSSS was stable in rocksim but never flew straight, everytime it did cartwheeles. Im assuming its because i just didnt have enough ... |
In forum Archives 2006-2010 |
17 years ago |
RE: 2009 SSS Discussion I think that using a lower-impulse motor that would keep it in the visible range is a great idea. That way, we can leave it up to the competitors as to whether they want to deal with the hassle of a ... |
In forum Club Contests |
17 years ago |
RE: G37 to 8241 feet if you are able to change calibration on site, soothing/manipulating data before sending in your data for an altitude record, it is. NO one is doing any of that before they submit their data, only yo... |
In forum Contests |
17 years ago |
RE: G37 to 8241 feet James, Of course the Parrot doesn't need to be recalibrated. I already said upthread that I rechecked the accuracy after the flight, just to be sure, and the accuracy was damn near perfect. The only... |
In forum Contests |
17 years ago |
RE: Need help making a FG tube If you go with a little more space and it's too sloppy, you can always tighten it up again by putting a thin coat of epoxy/microspheres on the outside of the airframe, and sanding it to get just the f... |
In forum Construction Help |
17 years ago |
RE: G37 to 8241 feet I always put a sealed bulkhead between the altimeter and the deployment charge. In the case of the booster converted to a single stage that went to 8241 feet, there were actually 3 separate pistons s... |
In forum Contests |
17 years ago |
RE: G37 to 8241 feet Thanks, Mike and Warren, for the constructive feedback. Mike, help is on the way in the form of a PC interface program that Jim Yehle has been kind enough to provide, which will simplify the download... |
In forum Contests |
17 years ago |
RE: G37 to 8241 feet I may have a somewhat different take on the record list than some people. Some view it as a contest like the upscale contest, in which it's possible to exclude some people from participating. I view... |
In forum Contests |
17 years ago |
RE: G37 to 8241 feet But why not shut up all the critics and just fly you rocket with another altimeter? If you can set an altitude record with the parrot, why not do it with another altimeter? I can fit a Parrot and a Be... |
In forum Contests |
17 years ago |
RE: G37 to 8241 feet James, The Parrot altimeters, like all barometric altimeters, measure pressure. The Parrot does so very accurately. I know it's accurate because I checked it against an accurate pressure reference g... |
In forum Contests |
17 years ago |
RE: G37 to 8241 feet Some food for thought: The "ideal" situation of presenting a beeping rocket to an LCO has a fundamental limitation: There's no way to prevent deployment or other transients from corrupting the data. ... |
In forum Contests |
17 years ago |
RE: G37 to 8241 feet James, I'll be happy to send the altimeter that sent the record to anyone that can calibrate it against a NIST-referenced standard. I have such a calibrated reference, and this morning, I verified th... |
In forum Contests |
17 years ago |