Forum Replies Created
|
RE: NAR Event in 2007! I'll be in, and I have a couple of potential designs that are easily in the 100g range. 200 gees is possible, though expensive (my only 200g design involves a J1299 and 6 H999's, which at 1800lbs aver... |
In forum Contests |
19 years ago |
|
RE: egg fans unite Sorry, but 300 was the claim. Y know me. Produce a rock sim that shows 300G's I'll buy it.--provided its accelaration and not dee 😛 And a bit of a vent, I go point on this mission and there is no back... |
In forum Contests |
19 years ago |
|
RE: egg fans unite I can't get 300 - even a MD rocket with no payload will only do 230 on the I1299. I can get a solid 90-100 gees with the J1999 though, and I'll do one better than just no broken shell: I'll bet that n... |
In forum Contests |
19 years ago |
|
RE: NAR Event in 2007! Couple seperate subjects: re the Eggs, it is doable, as I have argued from the beginning. But whether mother nature or the best thru-hole electronics balks first might be the best question. I seriousl... |
In forum Contests |
19 years ago |
|
RE: egg fans unite If it's an organized event, I'll go H999. Otherwise, if it's just kind of a fun event, I'll go J1999. So, which will it be 😆 As for the yolk thing, I theoretically got an egg to well over 300 gees, an... |
In forum Contests |
19 years ago |
|
RE: NAR Event in 2007! I have to agree on that. I have looked into some designs, and I think I have what I want to do picked out. It should be pretty fun, and the E BG's have some real potential with the E6 motor. |
In forum Contests |
19 years ago |
|
RE: NAR Event in 2007! Couple seperate subjects: re the Eggs, it is doable, as I have argued from the beginning. But whether mother nature or the best thru-hole electronics balks first might be the best question. I seriousl... |
In forum Contests |
19 years ago |
|
RE: NAR Event in 2007! Well, I don't see E BG anywhere in those - Nate'll be disappointed (as will I) Other than that, I like option B. |
In forum Contests |
19 years ago |
|
RE: Thoughts on Super Single Shot Honestly, you probably have as good a chance that day as any. All of us who go there every month manage to procrastinate and all fly in November anyways, so it's not like we pick and choose the month ... |
In forum Contests |
19 years ago |
|
RE: Thoughts on Super Single Shot That must be one helluva wind shear if it's shredding rockets when they're already at near mach or greater speeds 😯 |
In forum Contests |
19 years ago |
|
RE: NAR Event in 2007! Well, the NCR folks will see it polished and painted before anyone else 🙂 It should be all nice and pretty by the flight at Mayhem. With any luck, the paint won't be scratched up for its LDRS flight 😀... |
In forum Contests |
19 years ago |
|
RE: NAR Event in 2007! I used the time-independent acceleration equation, V(f)^2-V(i)^2 = 2ad In this case, after a fall of around 15 or 16 feet (around 4.9 meters), the velocity works out to be right at 9.8 meters per seco... |
In forum Contests |
19 years ago |
|
RE: Thoughts on Super Single Shot I'm not saying anything you commented on is wrong. I have no experience with your tapering method, so I can't comment on whether or not it works, and I will definitely have to try it sometime. If anyt... |
In forum Contests |
19 years ago |
|
RE: NAR Event in 2007! Nope. Simply knowing the speed at impact and estimating the distance that it stopped in based on the amount of deflection needed to cause a crack of the kind observed in the tupperware container. Turn... |
In forum Contests |
19 years ago |
|
RE: Thoughts on Super Single Shot As far as resonance goes, I have to disagree with you about cf vs fg. The nice thing about CF is that it is FAR stiffer than FG, so the resonant frequency of the resulting plate goes way up. Although ... |
In forum Contests |
19 years ago |
